Vanlandingham v. DESAK

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Vanlandingham v. DESAK

43 So. 3d 841, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12709, 2010 WL 3398384

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 31, 2010

Docket1D10-3264

StatusPublished

This text of 43 So. 3d 841 (Vanlandingham v. DESAK) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vanlandingham v. DESAK, 43 So. 3d 841, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12709, 2010 WL 3398384 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of July 14, 2010, the Court has determined that because the Order Denying Motion to Dis *842 miss is not an order that finally determines a right or obligation of an interested person in a probate matter, the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(a)(2). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

DAVIS, BENTON, and CLARK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of July 14, 2010, the Court has determined that because the Order Denying Motion to Dis *842 miss is not an order that finally determines a right or obligation of an interested person in a probate matter, the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(a)(2). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

DAVIS, BENTON, and CLARK, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 So. 3d 841, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12709, 2010 WL 3398384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vanlandingham-v-desak-fladistctapp-2010.