Vanlandingham v. DESAK

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Vanlandingham v. DESAK

43 So. 3d 841, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12709, 2010 WL 3398384

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 31, 2010·No. 1D10-3264·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of July 14, 2010, the Court has determined that because the Order Denying Motion to Dis *842 miss is not an order that finally determines a right or obligation of an interested person in a probate matter, the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(a)(2). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

DAVIS, BENTON, and CLARK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of July 14, 2010, the Court has determined that because the Order Denying Motion to Dis *842 miss is not an order that finally determines a right or obligation of an interested person in a probate matter, the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(a)(2). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

DAVIS, BENTON, and CLARK, JJ., concur.

Vanlandingham v. DESAK, 43 So. 3d 841, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12709, 2010 WL 3398384 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

43 So. 3d 841 (Vanlandingham v. DESAK) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.