Vanhouten v. Vagen

Indiana Supreme Court

Vanhouten v. Vagen

22 Ind. 274

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedMay 15, 1864

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 22 Ind. 274 (Vanhouten v. Vagen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vanhouten v. Vagen, 22 Ind. 274 (Ind. 1864).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this case the question attempted to be raised is in reference to the. ruling of the Court in striking out the second paragraph of the answer. There is no bill of exceptions presenting to us the pleading so stricken out, and it is not, therefore, before us; Adkins v. Hudson, 11 Ind. 372; nor does the fact that it was contained in the transcript of the justice, before whom the suit was commenced, change the rule. Grow v. Studabaker, 14 id. 519.

Coleriek J- Jordan, for the appellant. W. P. Fishback, for the appellee.

The judgment is affirmed, with 8 per cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In this case the question attempted to be raised is in reference to the. ruling of the Court in striking out the second paragraph of the answer. There is no bill of exceptions presenting to us the pleading so stricken out, and it is not, therefore, before us; Adkins v. Hudson, 11 Ind. 372; nor does the fact that it was contained in the transcript of the justice, before whom the suit was commenced, change the rule. Grow v. Studabaker, 14 id. 519.

Coleriek J- Jordan, for the appellant. W. P. Fishback, for the appellee.

The judgment is affirmed, with 8 per cent, damages and costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 Ind. 274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vanhouten-v-vagen-ind-1864.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack