VanHouse v. VanHouse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

VanHouse v. VanHouse

189 A.D.2d 950

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 7, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 189 A.D.2d 950 (VanHouse v. VanHouse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

VanHouse v. VanHouse, 189 A.D.2d 950 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Duskas, J.), entered July 25, 1991 in St. Lawrence County, which granted a motion by defendants Ronnie L. Swem and James River Corporation of Virginia for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them.

Order affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion of Justice Michael W. Duskas.

Mikoll, J. P., Levine, Mercure, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Duskas, J.), entered July 25, 1991 in St. Lawrence County, which granted a motion by defendants Ronnie L. Swem and James River Corporation of Virginia for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them.

Order affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion of Justice Michael W. Duskas.

Mikoll, J. P., Levine, Mercure, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 A.D.2d 950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vanhouse-v-vanhouse-nyappdiv-1993.