Vanguard Tours, Inc. v. Town of Yorktown

83 A.D.2d 866, 442 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15261
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 17, 1981
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 83 A.D.2d 866 (Vanguard Tours, Inc. v. Town of Yorktown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vanguard Tours, Inc. v. Town of Yorktown, 83 A.D.2d 866, 442 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15261 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for injuries to plaintiff’s property, defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Marbach, J.), dated September 19,1980, which, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $36,000. Judgment reversed, on the law, and matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for further proceedings consistent herewith. The findings of fact with respect to defendant’s liability are affirmed. The trial court properly found that plaintiff suffered water damage as a result of defendant’s failure to adequately maintain the crown on Front Street. Since a municipality is obligated to exercise ordinary care in maintaining its streets and drainage system, plaintiff is entitled to recover the damages caused by this failure (cf. Beck v City of New York, 23 Misc 2d 1036, affd 16 AD2d 809; Urquhart v City of Ogdensburg, 91 NY 67). While the trial court properly found that plaintiff also suffered water damage as a result of defendant’s failure to install an adequate drainage system, it improperly concluded that such a failure is actionable. The law is clear that a municipality is not liable for its failure to install a drainage system which adequately disposes of surface waters (see Beck v City of New York, supra; Geiger v City of New York, 141 NYS2d 667). Since the court did not apportion the damages, further proceedings are necessary to determine the damages caused by the failure to maintain the crown on Front Street. Hopkins, J.P., Rabin, Margett and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

GILBERTI, JR., WILLIAM J. v. TOWN OF SPAFFORD
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
Gilberti v. Town of Spafford
117 A.D.3d 1547 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Nandlal v. City of New York
66 A.D.2d 653 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Tappan Wire & Cable, Inc. v. County of Rockland
7 A.D.3d 781 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Johnston v. Town of Jerusalem
2 A.D.3d 1403 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Zeltmann v. Town of Islip
265 A.D.2d 407 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Biernacki v. Village of Ravena
245 A.D.2d 656 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Colgan v. Town of Hillsdale
498 N.E.2d 419 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Colgan v. Town of Hillsdale
117 A.D.2d 904 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Vanguard Tours, Inc. v. Town of Yorktown
102 A.D.2d 868 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 A.D.2d 866, 442 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vanguard-tours-inc-v-town-of-yorktown-nyappdiv-1981.