Vanguard Diversified, Inc. v. INSTITUTIONAL ASSOCIATES, INC.

233 S.E.2d 247, 141 Ga. App. 265, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1863
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 10, 1977
Docket52983
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 233 S.E.2d 247 (Vanguard Diversified, Inc. v. INSTITUTIONAL ASSOCIATES, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vanguard Diversified, Inc. v. INSTITUTIONAL ASSOCIATES, INC., 233 S.E.2d 247, 141 Ga. App. 265, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1863 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

Shulman, Judge.

Defendant nonresident corporation appeals from the denial of its motion to set aside a judgment rendered after service had been perfected upon it under our Long Arm Statute. The motion was based upon alleged lack of jurisdiction over the person.

1. This case is governed by the principles stated in Thrift v. Vi-Vin Products, Inc., 134 Ga. App. 717 (215 SE2d 709). We there ruled that a defense of lack of jurisdiction over the person is waived if no motion to *266 dismiss on this ground has been made nor included in a responsive pleading where the defendant nonresident has been properly served with process in accordance with the Long Arm Statute. The 1974 amendment to CPA § 60 (d) did not abolish the general rule of waiver by nonaction which exists where a defendant is properly served and elects not to respond to the process despite notice therein of its requirements. See Aiken v. Bynum, 128 Ga. App. 212 (196 SE2d 180).

Argued October 7, 1976 Decided February 10, 1977. Fierer & Devine, Foy R. Devine, for appellant. Jones & Barnwell, Taylor W. Jones, Kent Stair, for appellee.

In Echols v. Dyches, 140 Ga. App. 191 (230 SE2d 315) (1976), we applied that principle of waiver to resident defendants when they had been legally served and elected to do nothing.

2. Appellant’s request to overrule the cases of Aiken v. Bynum, supra, Thrift v. Vi-Vin Products, Inc., supra, and Echols v. Dyches, supra, is denied.

3. The motion to assess damages for a frivolous appeal is denied.

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, C. J., and Stolz, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoesch America, Inc. v. Dai Yang Metal Co.
459 S.E.2d 187 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1995)
Power v. Mobley
316 S.E.2d 580 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1984)
Crouch v. Crouch
641 S.W.2d 86 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1982)
U. S. Industries, Inc. v. Mitchell
252 S.E.2d 672 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
233 S.E.2d 247, 141 Ga. App. 265, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vanguard-diversified-inc-v-institutional-associates-inc-gactapp-1977.