Vane A. Cameron and Raymond G. Franks v. National Labor Relations Board
Opinion
This action having been heard upon the records, briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties;
And the Court being of the opinion that it lacks jurisdiction to review the order of the National Labor Relations Board, which petitioners herein complain of, under the provisions of either the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S. C.A. § 151 et seq., or the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 1001 et seq.; American Federation of Labor v. N. L. R. B., 308 U.S. 401, 60 S.Ct. 300, 84 L.Ed. 347; Ohio Power Co. v. N. L. R. B., 6 Cir., 164 F.2d 275; Timken-De-troit Axle Co. v. N. L. R. B., 6 Cir., 197 F.2d 512, 513. See also Heikkila v. Barber, 345 U.S. 229, 232-239, 73 S.Ct. 603; petition for rehearing denied 345 U.S. 946, 73 S.Ct. 828;
It is ordered that the motion of the National Labor Relations Board to dismiss the petition for review be sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
207 F.2d 775 (Vane A. Cameron and Raymond G. Franks v. National Labor Relations Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.