Vane A. Cameron and Raymond G. Franks v. National Labor Relations Board

207 F.2d 775, 33 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2133, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3603
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided October 23, 1953·No. 11851_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This action having been heard upon the records, briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties;

And the Court being of the opinion that it lacks jurisdiction to review the order of the National Labor Relations Board, which petitioners herein complain of, under the provisions of either the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S. C.A. § 151 et seq., or the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 1001 et seq.; American Federation of Labor v. N. L. R. B., 308 U.S. 401, 60 S.Ct. 300, 84 L.Ed. 347; Ohio Power Co. v. N. L. R. B., 6 Cir., 164 F.2d 275; Timken-De-troit Axle Co. v. N. L. R. B., 6 Cir., 197 F.2d 512, 513. See also Heikkila v. Barber, 345 U.S. 229, 232-239, 73 S.Ct. 603; petition for rehearing denied 345 U.S. 946, 73 S.Ct. 828;

It is ordered that the motion of the National Labor Relations Board to dismiss the petition for review be sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vane A. Cameron and Raymond G. Franks v. National Labor Relations Board, 207 F.2d 775, 33 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2133, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3603 (6th Cir. 1953).

207 F.2d 775 (Vane A. Cameron and Raymond G. Franks v. National Labor Relations Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heikkila v. Barber
345 U.S. 229 (Supreme Court, 1953)
Ohio Power Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
164 F.2d 275 (Sixth Circuit, 1947)