Vandyke v. O'Donell

Fourth Circuit

Vandyke v. O'Donell

222 F. App'x 264

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 27, 2007·No. No. 06-7454·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Dennis Roger Vandyke appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Vandyke v. O’Donell, No. 1:05-cv-00357 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 1, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Dennis Roger Vandyke appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Vandyke v. O’Donell, No. 1:05-cv-00357 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 1, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Vandyke v. O'Donell, 222 F. App'x 264 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

222 F. App'x 264 (Vandyke v. O'Donell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related