Vanduzor v. Linderman
10 Johns. 106
Opinion
No action lies merely for bringing a suit against a person without sufficient ground. (Savil v. Roberts, 1 Salk. 13. Purton v. Honnor, 1 Bos. Sr Pull. 205.) To sustain a suit for a former prosecution, it must appear to have been without cause, and malicious: and an action for malicious prosecution is not cognisable before a justice.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vanduzor v. Linderman, 10 Johns. 106 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1813).
10 Johns. 106 (Vanduzor v. Linderman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sachs v. Weinstein
208 A.D. 360 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)
Burt v. . Smith
73 N.E. 495 (New York Court of Appeals, 1905)
Paul v. Fargo
84 A.D. 9 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)
Lipscomb v. Shofner
33 S.W. 818 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1896)
Pope v. Pollock
46 Ohio St. (N.S.) 367 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1889)
Collins v. Shannon
30 N.W. 730 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1886)
Cross v. Elliot
69 Me. 387 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1879)
Lockenour v. Sides
57 Ind. 360 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1877)
Miller v. Milligan
48 Barb. 30 (New York Supreme Court, 1866)
McKown v. . Hunter
30 N.Y. 625 (New York Court of Appeals, 1864)
Newell v. Sanford
13 Iowa 463 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1862)
Benson & Co. v. McCoy
36 Ala. 710 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1860)