Vanduzen v. Schraffenberger

12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 718
CourtOhio Circuit Courts
DecidedJuly 1, 1898
StatusPublished

This text of 12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 718 (Vanduzen v. Schraffenberger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vanduzen v. Schraffenberger, 12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 718 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1898).

Opinion

The. wall of defendant’s building on the west side of Broadway encroaches upon and overhangs the lot of the plaintiff from two to six inches, and the present suit for an injuncton and $2,000 damages was [719]*719brought on that account. It was claimed by the plaintiff that adverse possession did not begin until knowledge of the encroachment was brought home to him, and so far as that part of the encroachment due to bulging is concerned, title could not be obtained by adverse possession. The defendant claimed by adverse possession, not by grantors, but upon his own part, tor more than twenty-one years before plaintiff acquired title to the lot upon which the encroachment extends. The common pleas court found for the defendant. The circuit court made the same holding and dismissed the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vanduzen-v-schraffenberger-ohiocirct-1898.