Vandornick v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Vandornick v. State

175 So. 3d 944, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 15040, 2015 WL 5918958

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 9, 2015

Docket2D15-1254

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 175 So. 3d 944 (Vandornick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vandornick v. State, 175 So. 3d 944, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 15040, 2015 WL 5918958 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

MORRIS, Judge.

We affirm the order dismissing William John Vandornick’s motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 without prejudice to his timely refiling his motion now that the direct appeal of his judgment and sentence has concluded. See Daniels v. State, 712 So.2d 765, 765 (Fla.1998) (holding that during the pen-dency of a direct appeal, a trial court is without jurisdiction to rule on a postcon-viction motion).

SILBERMAN and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORRIS, Judge.

We affirm the order dismissing William John Vandornick’s motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 without prejudice to his timely refiling his motion now that the direct appeal of his judgment and sentence has concluded. See Daniels v. State, 712 So.2d 765, 765 (Fla.1998) (holding that during the pen-dency of a direct appeal, a trial court is without jurisdiction to rule on a postcon-viction motion).

SILBERMAN and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 So. 3d 944, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 15040, 2015 WL 5918958, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vandornick-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack