Vandivere v. Stansberry
This text of Vandivere v. Stansberry (Vandivere v. Stansberry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6615
JAMES DOW VANDIVERE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden of FCC Petersburg Medium,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00037-JBF-TEM)
Submitted: August 26, 2009 Decided: September 2, 2009
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Dow Vandivere, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
James Dow Vandivere, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2006) petition and the district court’s order denying his Fed.
R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Vandivere v. Stansberry,
No. 2:09-cv-00037-JBF-TEM, (E.D. Va. Feb. 6, 2009 & March 16,
2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Vandivere v. Stansberry, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vandivere-v-stansberry-ca4-2009.