Vandiver v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Vandiver v. State

1924 OK CR 161, 226 P. 1118, 27 Okla. Crim. 256, 1924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 164

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 14, 1924

DocketNo. A-4260.

StatusPublished

This text of 1924 OK CR 161 (Vandiver v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vandiver v. State, 1924 OK CR 161, 226 P. 1118, 27 Okla. Crim. 256, 1924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 164 (Okla. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

BESSEY, J.

Dan Vandiver was on September 16, 1921, in the district court of McCurtain county, convicted of burglary in the second degree, with his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of five years. This appeal was regularly submitted on June 2, 1923, and at the request of plaintiff in error time was allowed by this court to file briefs. The several periods of time so allowed having long since lapsed, under the rules of- this court the judgment below should be affirmed. The record discloses that the accused was accorded a fair trial, and that the evidence adduced warranted the jury in arriving at the verdict rendered. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

MATSON, P. J., and DOYLE, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BESSEY, J.

Dan Vandiver was on September 16, 1921, in the district court of McCurtain county, convicted of burglary in the second degree, with his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of five years. This appeal was regularly submitted on June 2, 1923, and at the request of plaintiff in error time was allowed by this court to file briefs. The several periods of time so allowed having long since lapsed, under the rules of- this court the judgment below should be affirmed. The record discloses that the accused was accorded a fair trial, and that the evidence adduced warranted the jury in arriving at the verdict rendered. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

MATSON, P. J., and DOYLE, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1924 OK CR 161, 226 P. 1118, 27 Okla. Crim. 256, 1924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vandiver-v-state-oklacrimapp-1924.