Vandine v. Eherman & Lecanu

26 La. Ann. 388
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 15, 1874·No. No. 3037·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Morgan, J.

The object of this suit is to set aside as simulated and fraudulent, a cerlain sale of property by Joseph Kaiser to Eherman & Lecanu and Peter Kaiser, made to the prejudice of creditors.

The action is therefore a revocatory one, and as the petition discloses other parties in interest besides those who are made defendants, who were not made parties, we think the exception of the defendants should have been sustained.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the district court be avoided, annulled and reversed; that the exceptions be maintained, and this suit be dismissed as in case of nonsuit. Appellants to pay the costs in both courts.

Rehearing refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vandine v. Eherman & Lecanu, 26 La. Ann. 388 (La. 1874).

26 La. Ann. 388 (Vandine v. Eherman & Lecanu) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harvey v. Engler
168 So. 81 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1936)
Commercial Nat. Bank in Shreveport v. Haas
162 So. 57 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1935)
Lewis v. Gretna Trust & Savings Bank
148 So. 1 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1933)