Vandine v. Eherman & Lecanu

26 La. Ann. 388
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMay 15, 1874
DocketNo. 3037
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 26 La. Ann. 388 (Vandine v. Eherman & Lecanu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vandine v. Eherman & Lecanu, 26 La. Ann. 388 (La. 1874).

Opinion

Morgan, J.

The object of this suit is to set aside as simulated and fraudulent, a cerlain sale of property by Joseph Kaiser to Eherman & Lecanu and Peter Kaiser, made to the prejudice of creditors.

The action is therefore a revocatory one, and as the petition discloses other parties in interest besides those who are made defendants, who were not made parties, we think the exception of the defendants should have been sustained.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the district court be avoided, annulled and reversed; that the exceptions be maintained, and this suit be dismissed as in case of nonsuit. Appellants to pay the costs in both courts.

Rehearing refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harvey v. Engler
168 So. 81 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1936)
Commercial Nat. Bank in Shreveport v. Haas
162 So. 57 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1935)
Lewis v. Gretna Trust & Savings Bank
148 So. 1 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 La. Ann. 388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vandine-v-eherman-lecanu-la-1874.