Vandeville v. Emery

250 A.D. 827, 296 N.Y.S. 455, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9166

This text of 250 A.D. 827 (Vandeville v. Emery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vandeville v. Emery, 250 A.D. 827, 296 N.Y.S. 455, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9166 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Opinion

Motion for reargument denied; motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted and question for review certified. [See 249 App. Div. 795.] Order entered December 23, 1936, amended to provide that the affirmance was made as matter of law and not in the exercise of any discretion. (Order entered March 8, 1937.) Present — Sears, P. J., Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
250 A.D. 827, 296 N.Y.S. 455, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vandeville-v-emery-nyappdiv-1937.