Vandeventer v. Van Court

3 N.J.L. 169
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 15, 1807
StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.J.L. 169 (Vandeventer v. Van Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vandeventer v. Van Court, 3 N.J.L. 169 (N.J. 1807).

Opinion

By the Court.

— Although a common informer may bring an action generally in his own name, yet when the penalty is either given to the State, the poor of the township where the offence is committed, or others, he must declare specially qui tam, in order that the interest of those who have right, may appeal* of record, and be asserted. Judgment must, therefore, for this cause he reversed, a)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 N.J.L. 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vandeventer-v-van-court-nj-1807.