Vanderwerken v. Polachek
206 A.D. 765
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1923
StatusPublished
This text of 206 A.D. 765 (Vanderwerken v. Polachek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Vanderwerken v. Polachek, 206 A.D. 765 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1923).
Opinion
Motion for reargument denied. The answer alleges no facts by way of defense, which entitle the plaintiff to a bill of particulars. (London Produce Co., Inc., v. Poels & Brewster, Inc., 199 App. Div. 623.) Present — Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
London Produce Co. v. Poels & Brewster, Inc.
199 A.D. 623 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1922)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
206 A.D. 765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vanderwerken-v-polachek-nyappdiv-1923.