Vanderwerken v. Polachek
206 A.D. 765
Opinion
Motion for reargument denied. The answer alleges no facts by way of defense, which entitle the plaintiff to a bill of particulars. (London Produce Co., Inc., v. Poels & Brewster, Inc., 199 App. Div. 623.) Present — Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vanderwerken v. Polachek, 206 A.D. 765 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1923).
206 A.D. 765 (Vanderwerken v. Polachek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
London Produce Co. v. Poels & Brewster, Inc.
199 A.D. 623 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1922)