Vandervort v. Keen
This text of 1938 OK 598 (Vandervort v. Keen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an original proceeding by Dennis Vandervort and others for writ of prohibition against AV. P. Keen, district judge of Custer county, to arrest proceedings in an injunction suit brought in that court by the State Board of Barber Examiners against petitioners pursuant to article 2. chapter 24, S. L. 1937, known as the Barber Law.
The aforesaid statute is attacked as unconstitutional upon the same grounds as urged in the case of Herrin v. Arnold, 183 Okla. 392, 82 P.2d 977. The facts and circumstances here are in every respect analogous to those arising and presented in that case, and there all constitutional questions were resolved by the court against the contentions of the petitioner, and the writ denied. No additional questions are *122 presented in the instant case. Therefore, the law as stated and applied in the Herrin Case is controlling- and is adopted here, and demands denial of the writ.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1938 OK 598, 85 P.2d 405, 184 Okla. 121, 1938 Okla. LEXIS 441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vandervort-v-keen-okla-1938.