Vandervlist v. State

640 So. 2d 1227, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7883, 1994 WL 413382
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 10, 1994·No. No. 94-01950·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Steven Vandervlist appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief sought pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We reverse.

The trial court never reached the merits of Vandervlist’s motion, finding instead that the motion was untimely filed more than two years after the judgment and sentence became final. However, the trial court failed to support its finding by attaching a copy of the judgment and sentence to its order. Accordingly, we reverse and remand. The trial court may either deny the motion and attach documentation which demonstrates that Van-dervlist is not entitled to relief or conduct further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and FULMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vandervlist v. State, 640 So. 2d 1227, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7883, 1994 WL 413382 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

640 So. 2d 1227 (Vandervlist v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morais v. State
640 So. 2d 1227 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)