Vanderveer Associates—No. 1 v. Gross

205 A.D.2d 754, 614 N.Y.S.2d 316, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6670

This text of 205 A.D.2d 754 (Vanderveer Associates—No. 1 v. Gross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vanderveer Associates—No. 1 v. Gross, 205 A.D.2d 754, 614 N.Y.S.2d 316, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6670 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

In an action for, inter alia, an accounting, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.), dated December 16, 1993, which denied their motion for leave to amend their answer.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to defendants’ contention, the Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in denying their motion for [755]*755leave to amend their answer (see, CPLR 3025 [c]; Warner v Levinson, 188 AD2d 268). Sullivan, J. P., Balletta, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Warner v. Levinson
188 A.D.2d 268 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
205 A.D.2d 754, 614 N.Y.S.2d 316, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vanderveer-associatesno-1-v-gross-nyappdiv-1994.