Vandersloot v. Pennsylvania Water & Power Co.

104 A. 799, 262 Pa. 27, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 580
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 17, 1918·No. Appeal, No. 62·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This appeal is dismissed, at the costs of the appellant, on the following from the opinion of the learned court below making absolute the rule' to set aside the order of service and the service of the bill: “A careful examination of the amended bill and the prayers based thereon, leads to the conclusion that the present contention is controlled by the ruling of the Supreme Court (Vandersloot v. Pa. W. & P. Co., 259 Pa. 104). The prayers are so drafted that the court is asked to make such orders and decrees as would only pertain to the physical construction of the dam which exists in York County, yet it is quite obvious that any such order or decree would necessarily affect the entire dam of the defendant, the largest portion of which is outside the jurisdiction of the court.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vandersloot v. Pennsylvania Water & Power Co., 104 A. 799, 262 Pa. 27, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 580 (Pa. 1918).

104 A. 799 (Vandersloot v. Pennsylvania Water & Power Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rosenwald v. Rosenwald
4 Pa. D. & C.2d 163 (Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, 1955)