Vanderpoel v. Wright

1 Cow. 209
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1823·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Curia.

The notice of retainer is not an appearance. This can be in only one of three ways, viz. either by putting in special bail ; filing common bail ; or, causing an appearance to be entered at the Clerk^s office. (De Wendelaer v. Coomer & Doe, 6 John. 328.) Nor can this notice be considered equivalent to an appearance.

Motion granted. (a)

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vanderpoel v. Wright, 1 Cow. 209 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1823).

1 Cow. 209 (Vanderpoel v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Valentine v. Roberts
1 Alaska 536 (D. Alaska, 1902)
People ex rel. Lower v. Donovan
29 Abb. N. Cas. 172 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)
Hauswirth v. Sullivan
6 Mont. 203 (Montana Supreme Court, 1886)
State v. Richmond
26 N.H. 232 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1853)