Vanderkoogh v. Prudential Farms of Nassau County, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Vanderkoogh v. Prudential Farms of Nassau County, Inc.

245 A.D. 756

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 245 A.D. 756 (Vanderkoogh v. Prudential Farms of Nassau County, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vanderkoogh v. Prudential Farms of Nassau County, Inc., 245 A.D. 756 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the County Court of Hassau county affirming a judgment of the Justice’s Court of the town of Hempstead in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant for the sum of $187.51 reversed on the law, judgment of the Justice’s Court vacated, and the complaint dismissed, with costs. By the terms of the contract, under which the moneys sued for were deposited by the plaintiff with the defendant, an action cannot be maintained for their recovery until sixty days after the termination of said agreement, which agreement does not expire until eighteen months after plaintiff’s employment thereunder ceased. Scudder, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Hagarty, J., dissent and vote to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the County Court of Hassau county affirming a judgment of the Justice’s Court of the town of Hempstead in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant for the sum of $187.51 reversed on the law, judgment of the Justice’s Court vacated, and the complaint dismissed, with costs. By the terms of the contract, under which the moneys sued for were deposited by the plaintiff with the defendant, an action cannot be maintained for their recovery until sixty days after the termination of said agreement, which agreement does not expire until eighteen months after plaintiff’s employment thereunder ceased. Scudder, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Hagarty, J., dissent and vote to affirm.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 A.D. 756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vanderkoogh-v-prudential-farms-of-nassau-county-inc-nyappdiv-1935.