Vanderkloot v. Vanderkloot

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Vanderkloot v. Vanderkloot

39 A.D.2d 664, 332 N.Y.S.2d 1002, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4638

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 11, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 39 A.D.2d 664 (Vanderkloot v. Vanderkloot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vanderkloot v. Vanderkloot, 39 A.D.2d 664, 332 N.Y.S.2d 1002, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4638 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 6, 1972, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, to the extent of reducing to $250 per week the amount that defendant shall pay to the plaintiff for her support and maintenance and by reducing to $5,000 the amount that defendant shall pay to the plaintiff for additional counsel fees inclusive of disbursements, and, as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The record does not justify the awards of permanent alimony and additional counsel fees made at Trial Term and we consider them excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Murphy, McNally, Eager and Capozzoli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 6, 1972, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, to the extent of reducing to $250 per week the amount that defendant shall pay to the plaintiff for her support and maintenance and by reducing to $5,000 the amount that defendant shall pay to the plaintiff for additional counsel fees inclusive of disbursements, and, as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The record does not justify the awards of permanent alimony and additional counsel fees made at Trial Term and we consider them excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Murphy, McNally, Eager and Capozzoli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 A.D.2d 664, 332 N.Y.S.2d 1002, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vanderkloot-v-vanderkloot-nyappdiv-1972.