Vanderkamp v. State

706 S.W.2d 396, 288 Ark. 531
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided April 14, 1986·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellants have filed a motion for a rule to require the Clerk to file the record in this case. It appears that the record was tendered a day late. The appellants’ attorney, James E. Davis, accepts full responsibility for the delay.

This is a sufficient reason for accepting the record. See our per curiam opinion of February 5, 1979. 265 Ark. 964. The motion is accordingly granted.

A copy of this opinion will be sent to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Purtle, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vanderkamp v. State, 706 S.W.2d 396, 288 Ark. 531 (Ark. 1986).

706 S.W.2d 396 (Vanderkamp v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gass v. State
769 S.W.2d 24 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1989)