Vanderkamp v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Vanderkamp v. State

706 S.W.2d 396, 288 Ark. 531

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedApril 14, 1986

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 706 S.W.2d 396 (Vanderkamp v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vanderkamp v. State, 706 S.W.2d 396, 288 Ark. 531 (Ark. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellants have filed a motion for a rule to require the Clerk to file the record in this case. It appears that the record was tendered a day late. The appellants’ attorney, James E. Davis, accepts full responsibility for the delay.

This is a sufficient reason for accepting the record. See our per curiam opinion of February 5, 1979. 265 Ark. 964. The motion is accordingly granted.

A copy of this opinion will be sent to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Purtle, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI