Vanderhoff v. Harleysville Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Vanderhoff v. Harleysville Insurance

55 A.3d 1056

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 14, 2012

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 55 A.3d 1056 (Vanderhoff v. Harleysville Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vanderhoff v. Harleysville Insurance, 55 A.3d 1056 (Pa. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 14th day of November 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:

(1) What constitutes “actual prejudice” to relieve an insurance company of its obligation to pay insurance benefits to an insured?

(2) Should “actual prejudice” involve proof by an insurance carrier that it suffered a real material impairment of its ability to investigate and defend an uninsured claim?

(3) What constitutes a reasonable basis for a trial court finding that prejudice exists in a late report of a phantom vehicle?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI