Vanderhoff v. Harleysville Insurance

911 A.2d 917, 590 Pa. 10, 2006 Pa. LEXIS 2250
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 21, 2006·No. Appeal 401 MAL 2006·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 21st day of November, 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, LIMITED to the following question:

Whether an insurance carrier should be required to prove prejudice relative to the late reporting to the carrier of an accident involving an unidentified vehicle when such accident was timely reported to law enforcement officials?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vanderhoff v. Harleysville Insurance, 911 A.2d 917, 590 Pa. 10, 2006 Pa. LEXIS 2250 (Pa. 2006).

911 A.2d 917 (Vanderhoff v. Harleysville Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vanderhoff v. Harleysville Insurance Co.
78 A.3d 1060 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2013)
Vanderhoff v. Harleysville Insurance
997 A.2d 328 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2010)