Vanderhoff v. Harleysville Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Vanderhoff v. Harleysville Insurance

911 A.2d 917, 590 Pa. 10, 2006 Pa. LEXIS 2250

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 21, 2006

DocketAppeal 401 MAL 2006

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 911 A.2d 917 (Vanderhoff v. Harleysville Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vanderhoff v. Harleysville Insurance, 911 A.2d 917, 590 Pa. 10, 2006 Pa. LEXIS 2250 (Pa. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 21st day of November, 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, LIMITED to the following question:

Whether an insurance carrier should be required to prove prejudice relative to the late reporting to the carrier of an accident involving an unidentified vehicle when such accident was timely reported to law enforcement officials?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 21st day of November, 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, LIMITED to the following question:

Whether an insurance carrier should be required to prove prejudice relative to the late reporting to the carrier of an accident involving an unidentified vehicle when such accident was timely reported to law enforcement officials?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

911 A.2d 917, 590 Pa. 10, 2006 Pa. LEXIS 2250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vanderhoff-v-harleysville-insurance-pa-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack