Vanderbilt v. . the Travelers Insurance Company
139 N.E. 715, 235 N.Y. 514, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1223
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
*515 Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cabdozo, Pound and McLaughlin, JJ. Dissenting: Crane and Andrews, JJ., on ground that the word “war” in the exception of the policy because of its association, means war in which the insured participates as a belligerent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vanderbilt v. . the Travelers Insurance Company, 139 N.E. 715, 235 N.Y. 514, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1223 (N.Y. 1923).
139 N.E. 715 (Vanderbilt v. . the Travelers Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Metpath, Inc. v. Birmingham Fire Insurance
86 A.D.2d 407 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
505 F.2d 989 (Second Circuit, 1974)
Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. Et Al.
505 F.2d 989 (Second Circuit, 1974)
Shneiderman v. Metropolitan Casualty Co.
14 A.D.2d 284 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)
Stawski v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
7 Misc. 2d 424 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)
Bologna v. New York Life Ins. Co.
40 So. 2d 48 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1949)
Hooker v. New York Life Ins. Co.
161 F.2d 852 (Seventh Circuit, 1947)
Hooker v. New York Life Ins. Co.
66 F. Supp. 313 (N.D. Illinois, 1946)
Eggena v. New York Life Insurance
18 N.W.2d 530 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1945)
Stankus v. New York Life Insurance
44 N.E.2d 687 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1942)