Vander May v. Schoone-Jongen
21 A.2d 819, 130 N.J. Eq. 227, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 593
Opinion
The order under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Kays.
For affirmance — Parker, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Colie, Wells, Raeeertt, Hague, JJ. 10.
For reversal — The Chief-Justice, Donges, Dear, Thompson, JJ. 4. ..
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vander May v. Schoone-Jongen, 21 A.2d 819, 130 N.J. Eq. 227, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 593 (N.J. Ct. App. 1941).
21 A.2d 819 (Vander May v. Schoone-Jongen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hogan v. Bergen Brunswig Corp.
376 A.2d 1277 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1977)
Maryland Trust Co. v. Tulip Realty Co. of Maryland, Inc.
153 A.2d 275 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1959)
General Electric Co. v. Automobile Ass'n of NJ
117 A.2d 673 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Ferroline Corp. v. General AniLine & Film Corp.
207 F.2d 912 (Seventh Circuit, 1953)
Silbros, Inc. v. Solomon
52 A.2d 534 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1947)
Abalene Exterminating Co. of N.J., Inc. v. Elges
43 A.2d 165 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1945)