Vandenburg v. Brosnan
This text of 519 N.E.2d 618 (Vandenburg v. Brosnan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (129 AD2d 793). We note in addition, with respect to plaintiffs claim of common-law negligence, that the principles applied by the Appellate Division were recently reaffirmed by this court (see, D’Amico v Christie, 71 NY2d 76).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
519 N.E.2d 618, 70 N.Y.2d 940, 524 N.Y.S.2d 672, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vandenburg-v-brosnan-ny-1988.