Vandenberg v. Swanson & Youngdale, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Vandenberg v. Swanson & Youngdale, Inc.

829 N.W.2d 926, 2013 WL 1919543, 2013 Minn. LEXIS 259

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedMay 2, 2013

DocketNo. A12-1848

StatusPublished

This text of 829 N.W.2d 926 (Vandenberg v. Swanson & Youngdale, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vandenberg v. Swanson & Youngdale, Inc., 829 N.W.2d 926, 2013 WL 1919543, 2013 Minn. LEXIS 259 (Mich. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed and served on September 18, 2012, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/-

Wilhelmina M. Wright Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI