Vandegrift v. United States
This text of 113 F. 816 (Vandegrift v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
(orally). The articles imported were lap robes, made in part of wool, cotton being the component of chief value. They were assessed by the collector under paragraph 366 of the act of 1897, as “manufactures made wholly or in part of wool.” The importers insist that they should have been classified under paragraph 322 of the same act, as “manufactures of cotton, not specially provided for.”
The decision of the board of appraisers is affirmed upon the authority of U. S. v. Altman, 46 C. C. A. 116, 107 Fed. 15.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
113 F. 816, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vandegrift-v-united-states-circtsdny-1902.