Vandegrift v. United States

113 F. 816, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4805
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided March 18, 1902·No. No. 3,025·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

COXE, District Judge

(orally). The articles imported were lap robes, made in part of wool, cotton being the component of chief value. They were assessed by the collector under paragraph 366 of the act of 1897, as “manufactures made wholly or in part of wool.” The importers insist that they should have been classified under paragraph 322 of the same act, as “manufactures of cotton, not specially provided for.”

The decision of the board of appraisers is affirmed upon the authority of U. S. v. Altman, 46 C. C. A. 116, 107 Fed. 15.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vandegrift v. United States, 113 F. 816, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4805 (circtsdny 1902).

113 F. 816 (Vandegrift v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Converse v. United States
113 F. 817 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1902)