Vandalia Railroad v. Stringer

242 U.S. 614, 37 S. Ct. 113
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 13, 1916·No. No. 86·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction, with five per cent damages, upon the authority of Iowa Central Ry. Co. v. Iowa, 160 U. S. 389; Texas & New Orleans R. R. v. Miller, 221 U. S. 408, 416; Washington v. Miller, 235 U. S. 422, 429; Wabash Railroad Co. v. Hayes, 234 U. S. 86. Mr. Samuel O. Pickens, Mr. F. D. McKenney, Mr. Charles W. Moores and Mr. R. F. Davidson for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Wyman J. Beckett for the defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vandalia Railroad v. Stringer, 242 U.S. 614, 37 S. Ct. 113 (1916).

242 U.S. 614 (Vandalia Railroad v. Stringer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Lototsky
549 F. Supp. 996 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1982)
Elmore v. Elmore
99 So. 2d 265 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)
Mondell v. Thom
143 F.2d 157 (D.C. Circuit, 1944)
Gertman v. Burdick
123 F.2d 924 (D.C. Circuit, 1941)