Vandalia Railroad v. Stringer

Supreme Court

Vandalia Railroad v. Stringer

242 U.S. 614, 37 S. Ct. 113

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedNovember 13, 1916

DocketNo. 86

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 242 U.S. 614 (Vandalia Railroad v. Stringer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vandalia Railroad v. Stringer, 242 U.S. 614, 37 S. Ct. 113 (1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction, with five per cent damages, upon the authority of Iowa Central Ry. Co. v. Iowa, 160 U. S. 389; Texas & New Orleans R. R. v. Miller, 221 U. S. 408, 416; Washington v. Miller, 235 U. S. 422, 429; Wabash Railroad Co. v. Hayes, 234 U. S. 86. Mr. Samuel O. Pickens, Mr. F. D. McKenney, Mr. Charles W. Moores and Mr. R. F. Davidson for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Wyman J. Beckett for the defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction, with five per cent damages, upon the authority of Iowa Central Ry. Co. v. Iowa, 160 U. S. 389; Texas & New Orleans R. R. v. Miller, 221 U. S. 408, 416; Washington v. Miller, 235 U. S. 422, 429; Wabash Railroad Co. v. Hayes, 234 U. S. 86. Mr. Samuel O. Pickens, Mr. F. D. McKenney, Mr. Charles W. Moores and Mr. R. F. Davidson for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Wyman J. Beckett for the defendant in error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 U.S. 614, 37 S. Ct. 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vandalia-railroad-v-stringer-scotus-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack