Vandalia Railroad v. Cox

86 N.E. 1032, 43 Ind. App. 736, 1909 Ind. App. LEXIS 124
CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 3, 1909
DocketNo. 6,385
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 86 N.E. 1032 (Vandalia Railroad v. Cox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vandalia Railroad v. Cox, 86 N.E. 1032, 43 Ind. App. 736, 1909 Ind. App. LEXIS 124 (Ind. Ct. App. 1909).

Opinion

Hadley, J.

This was an action brought by appellee against appellant for reimbursement for money expended in constructing a fence along appellant’s right of way through appellee’s lands, under §§5447-5449 Burns 1908, Acts 1885, p. 224, §§1-3. Upon trial appellee was given judgment for the amount of her claim and $25 attorney’s fees.

The case in its substantial particulars is the same as the case of Vandalia R. Co. v. McAninch (1909), ante, 221, and upon the authority of that case this' cause is affirmed.

Other questions are presented in this case but they are all technical, unsubstantial and without merit. The action of the appellant in the premises is indefensible.

Judgment affirmed with ten per cent penalty thereon.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vandalia Railroad v. Walsh
89 N.E. 320 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 N.E. 1032, 43 Ind. App. 736, 1909 Ind. App. LEXIS 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vandalia-railroad-v-cox-indctapp-1909.