Vandagrift v. Tate

Indiana Supreme Court

Vandagrift v. Tate

4 Blackf. 174, 1836 Ind. LEXIS 20

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 2, 1836

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 4 Blackf. 174 (Vandagrift v. Tate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vandagrift v. Tate, 4 Blackf. 174, 1836 Ind. LEXIS 20 (Ind. 1836).

Pincite

Opinion

IN a suit before a justice of the peace, a bond with condition, which appears upon its face to have been executed between the parties to the suit, may be filed as the cause of action, without an assignment of breaches. Evans v. Shoemaker, 2 Blackf. 237.

But a note payable to a woman, who is one of the two plaintiffs in a suit, is not a sufficient statement of the cause of action, without an averment of her marriage with her co-plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN a suit before a justice of the peace, a bond with condition, which appears upon its face to have been executed between the parties to the suit, may be filed as the cause of action, without an assignment of breaches. Evans v. Shoemaker, 2 Blackf. 237.

But a note payable to a woman, who is one of the two plaintiffs in a suit, is not a sufficient statement of the cause of action, without an averment of her marriage with her co-plaintiff.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Blackf. 174, 1836 Ind. LEXIS 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vandagrift-v-tate-ind-1836.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack