Vandagrift v. Tate

4 Blackf. 174, 1836 Ind. LEXIS 20
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided December 2, 1836·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

IN a suit before a justice of the peace, a bond with condition, which appears upon its face to have been executed between the parties to the suit, may be filed as the cause of action, without an assignment of breaches. Evans v. Shoemaker, 2 Blackf. 237.

But a note payable to a woman, who is one of the two plaintiffs in a suit, is not a sufficient statement of the cause of action, without an averment of her marriage with her co-plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vandagrift v. Tate, 4 Blackf. 174, 1836 Ind. LEXIS 20 (Ind. 1836).

4 Blackf. 174 (Vandagrift v. Tate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Romack v. Hobbs
41 N.E. 391 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1895)
Garner v. Cook
30 Ind. 331 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1868)
Mullen v. Board of Commissioners
9 Ind. 502 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1857)
Evans v. Secrest
3 Ind. 541 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1852)
Williams v. Dickerson
8 Blackf. 287 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1846)
Hamilton v. Ewing
6 Blackf. 88 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1841)