Vancleve v. Boler

34 Ind. 538
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1870
StatusPublished

This text of 34 Ind. 538 (Vancleve v. Boler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vancleve v. Boler, 34 Ind. 538 (Ind. 1870).

Opinion

Worden, J.

The assignment of errors in this cause does not state the name of either of the parties. In short, there is no assignment of errors in this cause. The rule requiring the assignment of errors to state the names of all the parties has been long in force. Here there is no statement [539]*539whatever of the names of the parties or either of them. The assignment of error is the commencement of the suit in this court, and it is quite as essential that the names of the parties should appear in the assignment of error as in the complaint in an action in the, courts below.

W. A. Bonham, for appellant. J-. Brownlee and IT. Brownlee, for appellee.

The appeal is dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 Ind. 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vancleve-v-boler-ind-1870.