Vance v. Wier
This text of 10 Ky. 489 (Vance v. Wier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion.
This writ of error is prosecuted to reverses decree pronounced in favor of Wier, in a suit brought by him, in the circuit court against Vance.
The object of the suit was to be relieved from a judgment at law recovered by Vance on an obligation given by Lewis Sanders, together with Wier his surety, on the ground of the contract between Vauce and Sanders being [490]*490tisuriotri ; Sbd by the decree of the circuit court Witr’s injunction was made perpetual for the interest reserved and cost.
We have deemed it unnecessary to go into a minute detail of the facts and circumstances exhibited-in the record, 8s the casé presents no new principle and must turn 'exclusively on the question whether or not the contract, be! ween Vairce and Sanders, was usurious, and if usurious, as to the amount for which Wier has shewn himself entitled to relief.
We will suggest, however, that the evidence satisfactorily proves the contract to be usurious, and the amount decreed to Wier is not for more than the evidence shewn him to be entitled to.
The decree must be affirmed with cost.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 Ky. 489, 3 A.K. Marsh. 489, 1821 Ky. LEXIS 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vance-v-wier-kyctapp-1821.