Vance v. TASSMER

22 A.3d 1278, 301 Conn. 925, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 268
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJune 23, 2011
DocketSC 18807
StatusPublished

This text of 22 A.3d 1278 (Vance v. TASSMER) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vance v. TASSMER, 22 A.3d 1278, 301 Conn. 925, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 268 (Colo. 2011).

Opinion

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 128 Conn. App. 101 (AC 31754), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the trial court’s granting of the plaintiffs’ motion to enforce the settlement agreement?”
EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vance v. Tassmer
16 A.3d 782 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 A.3d 1278, 301 Conn. 925, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vance-v-tassmer-conn-2011.