Vance v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Vance v. State

198 S.W. 146

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 24, 1917·No. No. 4642·Published

Opinion

DAVIDSON, P. J.

Appellants were convicted of burglary, and their punishment assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary each.

The court gave a charge, and an additional charge. There were no exceptions reserved to the charges, or any other matter arising on the trial, and the evidence is not before us. So far as we are able to discover from the record, there is nothing requiring a reversal. In fact, the matters presented in the motion for new trial cannot be intelligently revised without the evidence.

The judgm’ent will thereafter be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, P. J.

Appellants were convicted of burglary, and their punishment assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary each.

The court gave a charge, and an additional charge. There were no exceptions reserved to the charges, or any other matter arising on the trial, and the evidence is not before us. So far as we are able to discover from the record, there is nothing requiring a reversal. In fact, the matters presented in the motion for new trial cannot be intelligently revised without the evidence.

The judgm’ent will thereafter be affirmed.

Vance v. State, 198 S.W. 146 (Tex. 1917).

Pincite

198 S.W. 146 (Vance v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.