Vance v. State
This text of 621 S.W.2d 224 (Vance v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant, Roy Eugene Vance, by his attorney, has again filed for a rule on the clerk. In a Per Curiam opinion issued July 13, 1931, we denied a similar motion.
His attorney, DeLoss McKnight, has attached an affidavit admitting that the record was entered late due to a mistake on his part.
We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.
A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
621 S.W.2d 224, 273 Ark. 495, 1981 Ark. LEXIS 1391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vance-v-state-ark-1981.