Vance v. Mims
Opinion
Case: 24-11037 Document: 31-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/12/2025
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
No. 24-11037 ____________ FILED May 12, 2025
In the Matter of Revolution Monitoring, L.L.C., Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Debtor,
Jeremiah Vance,
Appellant,
versus
Jeffery Mims,
Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:24-CV-1833
Before Smith, Graves, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Jeremiah Vance moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP)
on appeal from the district court’s dismissal as untimely of his appeal of the bankruptcy court’s order denying his motion to remove the liquidating
*
This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 24-11037 Document: 31-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/12/2025
No. 24-11037
trustee of the debtor, Revolution Monitoring, L.L.C. This court must examine the basis of its own jurisdiction, sua sponte, if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). Because Vance’s notice of appeal of the bankruptcy court’s order was untimely, we lack jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8002(a)(1); Dorsey v. U.S. Dep’t of Educ. (In re Dorsey), 870 F.3d 359, 362 (5th Cir. 2017); Smith v. Gartley (In re Berman-Smith), 737 F.3d 997, 1000-03 (5th Cir. 2013). Accordingly, Vance’s appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. His motion for leave to proceed IFP on appeal and motion for an extension of time are DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vance v. Mims (Vance v. Mims) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.