Vance v. Mims

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 12, 2025·No. 24-11037·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 24-11037 Document: 31-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/12/2025

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 24-11037 ____________ FILED May 12, 2025

In the Matter of Revolution Monitoring, L.L.C., Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Debtor,

Jeremiah Vance,

Appellant,

versus

Jeffery Mims,

Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:24-CV-1833

Before Smith, Graves, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Jeremiah Vance moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP)

on appeal from the district court’s dismissal as untimely of his appeal of the bankruptcy court’s order denying his motion to remove the liquidating

*

This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

Case: 24-11037 Document: 31-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/12/2025

No. 24-11037

trustee of the debtor, Revolution Monitoring, L.L.C. This court must examine the basis of its own jurisdiction, sua sponte, if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). Because Vance’s notice of appeal of the bankruptcy court’s order was untimely, we lack jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8002(a)(1); Dorsey v. U.S. Dep’t of Educ. (In re Dorsey), 870 F.3d 359, 362 (5th Cir. 2017); Smith v. Gartley (In re Berman-Smith), 737 F.3d 997, 1000-03 (5th Cir. 2013). Accordingly, Vance’s appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. His motion for leave to proceed IFP on appeal and motion for an extension of time are DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vance v. Mims, (5th Cir. 2025).

Vance v. Mims (Vance v. Mims) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marion Ray Mosley v. Officer M.D. Cozby
813 F.2d 659 (Fifth Circuit, 1987)
Charles Smith v. C. Gartley
737 F.3d 997 (Fifth Circuit, 2013)