Vance v. Griggs

Missouri Court of Appeals

Vance v. Griggs

503 S.W.3d 253, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 981, 2016 WL 5746254

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 4, 2016·No. WD 78794·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Per Curiam:

Ms. Valerie A. Vance, proceeding pro se, appeals the judgment sustaining the Defendants’ motion for directed verdict at the close of Plaintiffs evidence during a jury trial on her claim for breach of contract arising from the dissolution of a law practice. ., ■

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Per Curiam:

Ms. Valerie A. Vance, proceeding pro se, appeals the judgment sustaining the Defendants’ motion for directed verdict at the close of Plaintiffs evidence during a jury trial on her claim for breach of contract arising from the dissolution of a law practice. ., ■

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Vance v. Griggs, 503 S.W.3d 253, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 981, 2016 WL 5746254 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

503 S.W.3d 253 (Vance v. Griggs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.