Vance v. Evans
This text of 52 Cal. 93 (Vance v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Contest for the purchase of the east half of section thirty-six, township seven north, range one east, Humboldt Meridian. The township was sectionized May 28th, 1873; the plat was [94]*94approved August 14th, 1873; and was filed in the proper United States Land Office October 2nd, 1873. The defendant’s first application for the purchase was filed May 30th, 1873; and the plaintiff’s application was filed August 25th, 1873. The second application of the defendant was filed November 4th, 1874. The Court below dismissed the action, and both parties have appealed from the judgment.
The Court had no jurisdiction of the defendant’s second application, as it was filed after the order was made referring the contest to the District Court for determination. The only contests in respect to the right to purchase lands of which the District Courts have jurisdiction are those which arise in the Surveyor-General’s or the Register’s Office, and none had arisen in either of those offices concerning the defendant’s second application.
Neither of the other applications was sufficient, under the provisions of sec. 3408 of the Political Code; for the reason, among others, that neither applicant states that there is no claim to the land other than his own, as required by that section.
Mr. Chief Justice Wallace did not express an opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 Cal. 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vance-v-evans-cal-1877.