Vance v. Department of Public Safety
308 So. 2d 325, 1975 La. App. LEXIS 3656
Opinions
The excluded but proffered police report indicates plaintiff-appellee rear-ended a stopped car. Despite plaintiff’s refusal on Fifth Amendment grounds to testify at the departmental hearing and in the trial court, the requirement of security or suspension of her driver’s license was proper. Cross v. Waguespack, La.App.1975, 308 So.2d 321.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vance v. Department of Public Safety, 308 So. 2d 325, 1975 La. App. LEXIS 3656 (La. Ct. App. 1975).
308 So. 2d 325 (Vance v. Department of Public Safety) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ours v. West Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles
315 S.E.2d 634 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1984)
Vance v. Department of Public Safety
313 So. 2d 246 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1975)