Vance Edward Johnson, Relator v. Harris County District Clerk
This text of Vance Edward Johnson, Relator v. Harris County District Clerk (Vance Edward Johnson, Relator v. Harris County District Clerk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OF TEXAS
NO. AP-76,611
VANCE EDWARD JOHNSON, Relator
v.
HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK, Respondent
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
CAUSE NO. 1031454 IN THE 184TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
FROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam.Alcala, J., not participating.
Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in the 184th Judicial District Court of Harris County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that the application has not yet been forwarded to this Court.
On June 29, 2011, we held this application in abeyance and ordered the Respondent, the District Clerk of Harris County, to file a response. On August 1, we received a response. It included correspondence in which the State acknowledged receiving Relator's application on March 26, 2010. The response also included a copy of the State's proposed order designating issues, which the trial court signed on December 8, 2010.
Under Article 11.07 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the State shall answer an application within 15 days of the date it receives a copy. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(b). If the trial court determines that there are controverted, previously unresolved facts material to the legality of an applicant's confinement, it shall enter an order within 20 days of the expiration of the time the State is permitted to answer. Art. 11.07, § 3(d). In Relator's case, the trial court signed the State's proposed order designating issues on December 8, 2010. This order was not timely entered. "Without a timely entry of an order designating issues, Article 11.07 imposes a duty upon the clerk of the trial court to immediately transmit to this Court the record from the application for a writ of habeas corpus, deeming the trial court's inaction a finding that no issues of fact require further resolution." Gibson v. Dallas County Dist. Clerk, 275 S.W.3d 491, 492 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009).
We conditionally grant mandamus relief and direct the Respondent to immediately forward Relator's application to this Court. The writ of mandamus will issue only in the event that the Respondent fails to comply.
Filed: August 24, 2011
Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Vance Edward Johnson, Relator v. Harris County District Clerk, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vance-edward-johnson-relator-v-harris-county-distr-texcrimapp-2011.