Vance B. Humphries v. Virginia Correctional Enterprises Department of Corrections Lonnie E. Moore, Vce Manager Mike Greene, Vce Supervisor

21 F.3d 422, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15887, 1994 WL 83805
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 14, 1994
Docket93-7320
StatusPublished

This text of 21 F.3d 422 (Vance B. Humphries v. Virginia Correctional Enterprises Department of Corrections Lonnie E. Moore, Vce Manager Mike Greene, Vce Supervisor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vance B. Humphries v. Virginia Correctional Enterprises Department of Corrections Lonnie E. Moore, Vce Manager Mike Greene, Vce Supervisor, 21 F.3d 422, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15887, 1994 WL 83805 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

21 F.3d 422
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Vance B. HUMPHRIES, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
VIRGINIA CORRECTIONAL ENTERPRISES DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;
Lonnie E. Moore, VCE Manager; Mike Greene, VCE
Supervisor, Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-7320.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 17, 1994.
Decided March 14, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. John A. MacKenzie, Senior District Judge. (CA-93-824-N)

Vance B. Humphries, appellant pro se.

Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Humphries v. Virginia Correctional Enterprises, No. CA-93-824-N (E.D. Va. Dec. 6, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 F.3d 422, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15887, 1994 WL 83805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vance-b-humphries-v-virginia-correctional-enterpri-ca4-1994.