Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Vancamp v. Decision HR 30, Inc.

Vancamp v. Decision HR 30, Inc.

213 So. 3d 955, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12452
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 19, 2015
DocketNo. 1D14-5853
StatusPublished

This text of 213 So. 3d 955 (Vancamp v. Decision HR 30, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vancamp v. Decision HR 30, Inc., 213 So. 3d 955, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12452 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based on this Court’s decision in Westphal v. City of St. Peterburg/City of St. Petersburg Risk Management, 122 So.3d 440 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (en banc), the Judge of Compensation Claims correctly limited the award of temporary benefits to 104 weeks. On appeal in this Court, Appellant failed to establish that paragraph 440.15(4)(e), Florida Statutes (2007), is unconstitutional on its face or as applied to him.

AFFIRMED.

THOMAS, WETHERELL, and RAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg/City of St. Petersburg Risk Management
122 So. 3d 440 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
213 So. 3d 955, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vancamp-v-decision-hr-30-inc-fladistctapp-2015.