VanBlarcom v. Ætna Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

VanBlarcom v. Ætna Insurance

6 Mich. 299

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedMay 11, 1859

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 6 Mich. 299 (VanBlarcom v. Ætna Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

VanBlarcom v. Ætna Insurance, 6 Mich. 299 (Mich. 1859).

Pincite

Opinion

The Chibe Justice:

The case must be dismissed. By analogy to the statute-limiting* the' time for bringing writs of error to two years, the party who, for that length of time, neglects to cause the case he has procured to be settled, to be returned to thisr Court, must be deemed to have abandoned it. If we look into tbe reasons given here for the delay, we can not regard them as sufficiently excusing it after the first six or eight-months.

But as either party might have moved in the cause after-the case had been settled and filed, we will not give costa, on this motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Chibe Justice:

The case must be dismissed. By analogy to the statute-limiting* the' time for bringing writs of error to two years, the party who, for that length of time, neglects to cause the case he has procured to be settled, to be returned to thisr Court, must be deemed to have abandoned it. If we look into tbe reasons given here for the delay, we can not regard them as sufficiently excusing it after the first six or eight-months.

But as either party might have moved in the cause after-the case had been settled and filed, we will not give costa, on this motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Mich. 299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vanblarcom-v-tna-insurance-mich-1859.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack