VANAUKEN v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

VANAUKEN v. State

1 So. 3d 368, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2356, 2009 WL 211078

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 30, 2009

Docket5D08-2995

StatusPublished

This text of 1 So. 3d 368 (VANAUKEN v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

VANAUKEN v. State, 1 So. 3d 368, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2356, 2009 WL 211078 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Frederick Vanauken appeals from the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The State appropriately concedes error as to claims 4, 5, 11, and 12. On remand, the trial court shall attach to its order portions of the record conclusively refuting these claims or, alternatively, conduct an eviden- *369 tiary hearing. The remainder of the trial court’s order is affirmed.

AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; REMANDED.

GRIFFIN, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Frederick Vanauken appeals from the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The State appropriately concedes error as to claims 4, 5, 11, and 12. On remand, the trial court shall attach to its order portions of the record conclusively refuting these claims or, alternatively, conduct an eviden- *369 tiary hearing. The remainder of the trial court’s order is affirmed.

AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; REMANDED.

GRIFFIN, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 So. 3d 368, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2356, 2009 WL 211078, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vanauken-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.