Vanatta v. Philad Co.
109 F.2d 1022, 44 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 720, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 4075
This text of 109 F.2d 1022 (Vanatta v. Philad Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Vanatta v. Philad Co., 109 F.2d 1022, 44 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 720, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 4075 (9th Cir. 1940).
Opinion
Upon stipulation of counsel for respective parties, and good cause therefor appearing, ordered appeal, D.C., 28 F.Supp. 539, and cross-appeal herein dismissed, each party bearing his own costs of appeal, that a decree of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and that the mandate of this court issue forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Philad Co. v. Vanatta
28 F. Supp. 539 (S.D. California, 1939)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
109 F.2d 1022, 44 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 720, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 4075, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vanatta-v-philad-co-ca9-1940.