Vanater v. Allstate Insurance
This text of 279 So. 2d 40 (Vanater v. Allstate Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant-plaintiff, Homer M. Vanater, appeals a final judgment denying reformation of a fire insurance policy in an action for reformation of the insurance policy and seeking payment under the policy as reformed. We reverse.
The sole point on appeal which we consider is that the trial court erred when it instructed the jury that appellant must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a mutual mistake had been made in the issuance of the insurance policy.
The general rule is that when, because of a mutual mistake, a written instrument does not express the true agreement of the parties, equity will reform the written instrument where the mutual mistake has been established by clear and convincing evidence. 76 C.J.S. Reformation of Instruments §§ 26, 84 (1952); Bell Corporation v. Bahama Bar & Restaurant, Inc., 74 So.2d 292 (Fla.1954); Coastal States Life Insurance Co. v. Raphael, 183 So.2d 274 (Fla.App.1966) and cases cited n. 1. [41]*41It was, therefore, error for the trial court to instruct the jury that the mutual mistake need be established beyond a reasonable doubt. 4
Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded1 for further proceedings consistent with the views expressed herein.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
279 So. 2d 40, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vanater-v-allstate-insurance-fladistctapp-1973.